LLM Models Comparison: GPT-4, Bard, LLaMA, Flan-UL2, BLOOM

If you would like to contribute your own blog post, feel free to reach out to us via blog@deepchecks.com. We typically pay a symbolic fee for content that’s accepted by our reviewers.

Introduction

The main goal of large language models (LLMs) revolves around language prediction. They acquire the skill to anticipate subsequent words in a sequence, relying on the provided context. This expertise equips them with the capacity to produce text that is coherent and contextually appropriate. Such an ability propels their usefulness in various tasks such as generating text, completing sentences, and fostering creative writing. Their inherent creativity ushers in many opportunities for individuals like writers, marketers, and content developers who are in pursuit of inspiration or support in crafting top-notch written material.

GPT-4

GPT-4 is the result of the tireless efforts of OpenAI, a pioneering organization at the forefront of AI research and development. OpenAI has a proven track record of delivering state-of-the-art language models, and GPT-4 is their latest marvel. It boasts an astonishing parameter count, with a staggering 1.5 Trillion parameters. This massive parameter size allows the model to capture intricate patterns and dependencies within language, resulting in improved text generation, understanding, and contextual coherence. Accessing the power of GPT-4 is facilitated through the OpenAI API. By leveraging the API, developers and researchers can integrate its capabilities into their own applications, systems, or research projects. This seamless integration allows for on-demand access to the language generation prowess of GPT-4, making it a versatile tool for a wide range of applications.

GPT-4

GPT-4 (Source)

Its training relies on a meticulously curated dataset encompassing diverse textual sources. This vast dataset includes books, articles, websites, and other textual materials carefully selected to provide GPT-4 with a broad understanding of language and knowledge in various domains. At its core, GPT-4 is primarily a text-based language model; however, it can also take images as well as text as input, which shows good performance on a variety of tasks. It is designed with extensive multilingual support, enabling it to understand and generate text in multiple languages. It has been trained on a diverse range of languages, allowing users to interact with GPT-4 in their preferred language. This multilingual support broadens GPT-4’s reach and applicability, making it a versatile tool for communication, content generation, and language-related tasks on a global scale.

BARD

BARD is the result of the devoted efforts of a team of specialists and researchers who are dedicated to pushing the boundaries of reasoning-based language processing. This revolutionary language model is a product of Google. BARD’s design and development phase involved extensive research, rigorous testing, and continuous refinement. It is an extraordinary language model, housing a significant 1.6 trillion parameters. This voluminous parameter scale empowers BARD to discern complex patterns and language subtleties, equipping it to generate text that’s exceptionally precise and contextually pertinent. It is outfitted with many unique features that distinguish it from other language models. A prominent highlight is its ability to generate scientifically precise and in-depth explanations. It showcases superior reasoning capabilities, enabling it to dissect complex issues and suggest logical remedies.

BARD

Bard (Source)

The training corpus used for BARD is an intricately collated collection that spans a wide variety of sources. It processes a vast array of text data from multiple domains, such as scientific manuscripts, research papers, books, and articles. The principal aim during BARD’s training phase is to create a language model that excels in tasks requiring reasoning. The model, subjected to exhaustive training, emphasizing these objectives, learns to deduce, infer, and produce text aligned with scientific scrutiny. This goal-oriented training equips it with a specialized knowledge base, thus making it a potent tool for tasks involving biological and scientific comprehension. Using this broad training data, BARD acquires an in-depth language understanding, thereby enabling it to generate well-informed and contextually fitting responses over various subjects. Through training on this specialized dataset, it develops a profound understanding of terminologies and scientific reasoning, allowing it to generate precise and insightful responses tailored to the specific domain. To harness BARD’s capabilities, users can employ a dedicated API designed for frictionless integration. This API enables developers and researchers to utilize its advanced language processing prowess within their respective applications, platforms, or scientific pursuits. Even though BARD primarily focuses on language processing, it can also process multimodal inputs to augment understanding and responses. Incorporating visual or auditory data alongside text prompts, it can generate outputs that are more contextually apt and thorough. This model is engineered to support various languages, enabling users to employ the model for language processing tasks across diverse linguistic scenarios.

LLaMA

LLaMA is a product of MetaAI, a trailblazing organization in AI research and development. It embodies their dedication to progress in the field of natural language comprehension and production. LLaMA presents its mastery with 1.2 trillion parameters. Its superior text completion abilities empower users to generate natural and coherent text from incomplete input. Furthermore, LLaMA’s semantic comprehension allows it to understand intricate queries and provide accurate and enlightening responses. LLaMA exhibits fine multimodal capabilities, enabling it to process and generate text in concert with other sensory modalities. By incorporating visual, auditory, or other sensory data, LLaMA can produce more exhaustive and contextually fitting outputs.

LLaMA

Source: Industrywired

Its training data originates from an expansive and varied corpus, incorporating a range of textual sources. The training dataset is composed of a carefully assembled collection of varied textual sources. These sources are judiciously chosen to encompass a broad spectrum of topics, genres, and linguistic variations. By exploiting this comprehensive training data, LLaMA achieves a thorough understanding of language, thereby facilitating the generation of contextually apt and coherent text over a wide array of topics. The training objectives for LLaMA center around language modeling, enabling the model to predict the ensuing word in a sequence and grasp language constructs. This objective-guided training equips LLaMA with the prowess to produce fluent and significant text, rendering it an essential instrument for an extensive range of language-centric tasks. Providing multilingual support, enabling communication and text generation in a multitude of languages is another characteristic of this model. LLaMA can understand and generate text in various languages, thus overcoming language hurdles and promoting cross-lingual communication and comprehension. Access to LLaMA’s potent capabilities is facilitated through a user-friendly interface designed for effortless integration. Users can employ this interface to incorporate language generation competencies into their own applications, platforms, or creative pursuits, thus fully unleashing language proficiency.

Flan-UL2

Flan-UL2 is a product of Google Research, symbolizing their dedication to advancing the frontiers of language comprehension and generation. This model commands attention with its formidable 20 billion parameters. It flaunts an array of distinguishing features that set it apart from other language models. Its superior text completion abilities enable users to produce natural, consistent text based on partial input. The power of this model can be harnessed via an easily navigable interface. Users can utilize this interface to incorporate Flan-UL2’s language generation capabilities into their personal applications, platforms, or creative pursuits, thereby unleashing the full potential of its language expertise.

The training objectives are centered on enabling the model to anticipate the subsequent word in a sequence and grasp language structure. Such objective-guided training furnishes Flan-UL2 with the capacity to create smooth and meaningful text applicable to an array of language-oriented tasks. The training data includes a varied corpus drawn from numerous textual resources. By tapping into this bountiful training data, Flan-UL2 obtains a holistic understanding of language, which translates into the production of coherent and pertinent text across diverse domains and subjects. This considerable number allows the model to discern complex linguistic patterns, resulting in precise and contextually appropriate text generation. The training dataset consists of a meticulously assembled collection of diverse textual sources. These sources, handpicked to span a wide range of topics, genres, and linguistic variations, aid Flan-UL2 in obtaining a deep comprehension of language subtleties and in generating contextually fitting and precise text. This model showcases striking multimodal capabilities, allowing it to process and generate text in harmony with other sensory modalities. By factoring in visual, auditory, or other sensory data, Flan-UL2 can produce more exhaustive and contextually pertinent outputs, broadening its application spectrum and fostering superior communication and understanding. It excels in multilingual support, making it conducive to text generation and communication in numerous languages. Flan-UL2 can comprehend and generate text in a variety of languages, thereby overcoming language obstacles and promoting cross-lingual communication and understanding.

BLOOM

BLOOM is the creation of the BigScience Workshop. It demonstrates its might with a huge parameter count, touting 176 billion parameters. This significant parameter scope enables it to discern detailed linguistic patterns, thereby delivering precise and contextually pertinent text generation. It distinguishes itself from other language models by introducing unique features. Its superior text optimization capabilities equip users with the power to generate text that adheres to specific parameters such as style, tone, or readability. Access to the capabilities of this model is made simple through an intuitive interface designed for straightforward integration. Users can utilize this interface to blend BLOOM’s language optimization skills into their personal applications, platforms, or creative ventures, thereby capitalizing on BLOOM’s potential for specific language generation requirements. BLOOM showcases multimodal capabilities, allowing it to process and optimize text alongside other modalities. By integrating visual, auditory, or other sensory data, it can enrich text generation based on multiple dimensions, encouraging more exhaustive and contextually relevant outputs.

Bloom

Bloom (Source)

The training of BLOOM revolves around language refinement and optimization modeling. Its training corpus is drawn from diverse textual resources, including literature, articles, and other pertinent content. The training objectives are focused on enabling the model to enhance and optimize text generation. Training on this varied dataset allows it to gain profound insights into language subtleties and use this understanding to optimize text generation in line with set objectives or criteria. This model can optimize text generation in various languages, thereby surmounting language barriers and enabling multilingual language optimization.

Summary

Finally, the table presents these language models, each distinguished by unique features and capabilities. The models GPT-4, Bard, LLaMA, Flan-UL2, and BLOOM vary significantly in their number of parameters, training data, training objectives, special features, accessibility, releasing entity, and more. While most of these models rely on a WebText-like corpus for training and are primarily designed for language modeling, Flan-UL2 distinguishes itself by using a Mixture-of-Denoisers (MoD) training objective and its universal effectiveness across various NLP tasks. Furthermore, while most models are available through APIs or specific applications, BLOOM stands out as an open-source model. As AI continues to evolve, such comparisons will become increasingly crucial in understanding the strengths and applications of different models in this rapidly advancing field.

Deepchecks For LLM VALIDATION

LLM Models Comparison: GPT-4, Bard, LLaMA, Flan-UL2, BLOOM

  • Reduce Risk
  • Simplify Compliance
  • Gain Visibility
  • Version Comparison
TRY LLM VALIDATION

Table Summary

Feature/Model ParametersGPT-4 1.5 TrillionBard 1.6 TrillionLLaMA 1.2 TrillionFlan-UL2 20 BillionBLOOM 176 Billion
Training DataWebText-like corpusWebText-like corpusWebText-like corpusPublicly available dataMultilingual web corpus
Training ObjectivesLanguage modelingLanguage modelingLanguage modelingMixture-of-Denoisers (MoD)Not specified
Special FeaturesImproved prompt designImproved prompt designImproved prompt designUniversally effective across NLP tasksOpen-access, multilingual
How to AccessVia OpenAI APIVia Google WorkspaceApplication requiredNot specifiedOpen-source
Released ByOpenAIGoogleMeta AIGoogle ResearchBigScience Workshop
Dataset Used for TrainingWebText-like corpusWebText-like corpusWebText-like corpusPublicly available dataMultilingual web corpus
Multimodal CapabilitiesNoNoNoNoYes
Multilingual SupportYesLimitedYesYesYes

How do you choose the best LLM for your business?

Whether you plan to apply the LLM for a conservational system, a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline, or even fine-tune it with your custom dataset, selecting the right LLM will impact your return on investment. This section will provide you with points to consider when comparing and choosing the  LLM that is most suitable for your project’s requirements. It is vital to remember these factors when comparing LLMs.

Define Your Business Needs

Define the proposed LLM use cases in your business. Are you looking to improve customer service or understanding and get insights from vast text data? Define these tasks precisely with respective capabilities, such as multilingualism, multimodal, or code generation, to guide research efforts to find the model that aligns with your needs.

Your Business Needs

Photo by fauxels

Consider Accessibility and Integration

Assess the ease of integration of the model options and defined requirements with your current technological stack and business procedures. Look for easy integration and strong system support based on your team’s experience. Examine the documentation provided by the LLM provider. Other important things to check for include the responsiveness of their support channels and the existence of an active community for troubleshooting.

Assess Cost and Scalability

Consider the pricing strategies of the LLMs on your shortlist. Look for subscription-based or pay-per-use services in addition to other business models. You should be able to estimate the price, so ensure that it is within your budget. Ensure the LLM you are choosing will scale with your business; you don’t want your model to be out of space while operating to meet increased demands, losing efficiency. A cost-benefit analysis LLM will help you choose the LLM that gives you the most return on investment.

Assess Cost and Scalability

Photo by Lukas

Consider Ethical and Safety Implications

Be cautious about the ethical and security considerations when implementing such systems. You need to consider how the models on the shortlist reduce risks in relation to bias, information, or any other unforeseen consequences. You should be cautious, ensuring these LLM companies have enough safeguards against security lapses and unauthorized use of the data by going through their data privacy and security policies. Confirm that they comply with laws like the CCPA and GDPR, especially if your company is located in a place with stringent privacy laws.

Experiment and Test

Do not rely only on theoretical specifications. Test shortlisted LLMs on your specific use cases and data but on LLM testbeds. This way, you learn their actual behavior and can make a knowledgeable choice. In addition, a comparative experimentation study of LLMs can reveal practical strengths and weaknesses that are often difficult to discern from the documentation alone.

Future-Proofing Your Choice

Check the vendor’s future roadmap and commitment to constant evolution. A well-defined roadmap shows that the performance and ability of the model are constantly being improved by the vendor. Look for models with a strong support ecosystem and large community support. While a strong community can provide guidance, advice, and answers to problems, universal support ensures you get the help you need when you need it. Future-proofing should be one of your criteria when choosing an LLM to make sure the model you choose grows and scales with your business.

Final notes

Having the above considerations at hand, you can opt for the best LLM that meets your company’s needs. Keep in mind that the best LLM is the one that helps you attain your specific objectives, not necessarily the most powerful or expensive one.

Deepchecks For LLM VALIDATION

LLM Models Comparison: GPT-4, Bard, LLaMA, Flan-UL2, BLOOM

  • Reduce Risk
  • Simplify Compliance
  • Gain Visibility
  • Version Comparison
TRY LLM VALIDATION

Recent Blog Posts

Precision vs. Recall in the Quest for Model Mastery
Precision vs. Recall in the Quest for Model Mastery