🎉 Deepchecks’ New Major Release: Evaluation for LLM-Based Apps!  Click here to find out more 🚀

Key Challenges for Root

If you would like to contribute your own blog post, feel free to reach out to us via blog@deepchecks.com. We typically pay a symbolic fee for content that’s accepted by our reviewers.


The expansion of Large Language Models (LLMs) has enabled the development of diverse applications with advanced language understanding capabilities. LLMs undergo training on extensive datasets, harnessing deep learning techniques to acquire knowledge of patterns, language structures, and the interconnections between words and sentences. This has led to a transformative impact on Natural Language Processing (NLP) and triggered significant research and development efforts. Prominent models like BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representation from Transformers) and GPT-3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3) have impressively showcased their proficiency across diverse NLP tasks, encompassing text generation, machine translation, question answering, summarization, and more.

In recent times, there has been a growth of these models designed for addressing various real-world challenges. For instance, Antropic’s Claude2 represents a notable LLM application, excelling in tasks such as paper composition and coding. Additionally, Google’s PaLM serves as a scalable LLM, demonstrating exceptional capabilities in multilingual tasks and code generation. Undoubtedly, the recent advancements in LLMs have substantiated their potential to improve human productivity. Nevertheless, it remains critical to acknowledge that LLMs are essentially black boxes, characterized by a lack of explainability, and their consistent performance in diverse real-world scenarios cannot be guaranteed. However, the use of LLMs in applications introduces unique challenges that affect their reliability and effectiveness. Root-cause analysis (RCA) in LLM-based applications is crucial for identifying and addressing these challenges. Let’s delve into the analysis.

“If you are unable to understand the cause of a problem, it is impossible to solve it.”

Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan

RCA is a systematic and structured approach to identifying and addressing the underlying causes of problems rather than merely treating their symptoms. In various fields, such as engineering and business, RCA plays an important role in improving problem-solving processes and decision-making and preventing the recurrence of issues.

RCA follows a structured process, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation. It involves a systematic process of identifying and addressing the underlying factors responsible for issues, errors, or challenges that may arise during the development, deployment, or usage of LLM applications. Therefore, RCA examines the cause-and-effect relationships between factors contributing to the problem and fosters a culture of continuous improvement by addressing underlying issues.

The complexities and challenges highlighted can serve as key areas for RCA.

LLM-Based Applications

LLM-based applications (such as Bard, Jasper, CopyAI, Vectara, ChatGPT, LaMDA, Character.ai, and Grammarly) leverage the language generation and comprehension abilities of LLM models to improve user experiences. Nonetheless, several challenges are associated with conducting RCA in this context:

1. Contextual Memory and Context Limitations:

  • Root Cause: Context size limitations for input are confronted when using LLMs.
  • Analysis: The root cause is inherent to LLMs, which are designed to process a fixed number of tokens. This limitation may lead to challenges when dealing with extensive contextual information.
  • Mitigation: Developers must implement strategies such as context partitioning or dynamic context switching to manage large contexts effectively. However, some limitations may persist due to model constraints.

2. Data Enrichment:

  • Root Cause: Integrating diverse and exclusive data can be complex.
  • Analysis: The root cause stems from the need to effectively incorporate data from various sources, making data enrichment a challenging task.
  • Mitigation: Designing an abstraction layer can simplify data retrieval from different sources, streamlining the data enrichment process.

3. Bias:

  • Root Cause: Biases from the training data (from various sources, such as the way data is collected or organized) that were used to create the models.
  • Analysis: LLMs learn language patterns and associations from vast datasets, which may unintentionally contain biases from the sources of data. This leads to the reproduction of biased content in generated responses.
  • Mitigation: Developers should utilize diverse training data, conduct bias audits, apply mitigation techniques during fine-tuning, involve human oversight, establish feedback loops for user reports, and promote transparency and accountability throughout the development process.

4. Templating:

  • Root Cause: Templating involves creating dynamic inputs for LLMs, which can be challenging to manage.
  • Analysis: The primary issue is the need to structure inputs and dynamically fill them with data.
  • Mitigation: Employing frameworks can streamline input organization and data population, improving the maintenance of the code.

5. Testing and Fine-Tuning:

  • Root Cause: Achieving satisfactory LLM accuracy requires extensive testing and fine-tuning.
  • Analysis: The root cause is the iterative nature of refining LLM behavior through user feedback and trial and error.
  • Mitigation: Establishing a dedicated testing framework and implementing a user feedback loop can facilitate this process, ensuring that LLM outputs align with user expectations and application requirements.

6. Caching:

  • Root Cause: Caching LLM responses is essential to optimize costs and performance.
  • Analysis: The root cause arises from the need to balance API costs and maintain application performance by reducing the load on the LLM provider.
  • Mitigation: Building an efficient caching mechanism is crucial to minimize API costs and ensure application responsiveness.

7. Security and Compliance:

  • Root Cause: Ensuring data privacy and regulation compliance represents a complex process.
  • Analysis: The root cause lies in the need to maintain data confidentiality and adhere to stringent privacy and security standards.
  • Mitigation: Regular data audits, robust security measures, and clear policies and procedures are essential to mitigate this challenge effectively.

8. Observability:

  • Root Cause: Monitoring LLM performance is necessary but complex because it involves tracking various aspects of the application.
  • Analysis: The need to track errors and processing times. These metrics are essential for understanding how well the application is functioning and whether it meets performance expectations.
  • Mitigation: Developing a robust monitoring infrastructure is proposed as a mitigation strategy because it allows for the systematic observation of these performance metrics. By closely observing these factors, issues can be identified immediately, enabling corrective actions to be taken to ensure the smooth operation of LLM-based applications.

Key Challenges for Root

  • Reduce Risk
  • Simplify Compliance
  • Gain Visibility
  • Version Comparison

LLM Analytics

Analytics platforms have emerged as transformative tools for organizations seeking to harness the power of natural language data. LLM platforms leverage advanced language understanding capabilities to process, interpret, and extract meaningful insights from unstructured textual data. They offer a range of features, including data processing, insight generation, customization, real-time analysis, and data visualization. Organizations can use these platforms to uncover valuable information about customer sentiments, emerging trends, market dynamics, and more, enabling data-driven decision-making. These platforms are adaptable and customizable, making them suitable for diverse industries and domains. They also prioritize compliance and data security, ensuring the protection of sensitive information. With multilingual support and continuous improvement through training and fine-tuning, these platforms provide organizations with the means to gain a competitive edge in today’s data-driven world. By transforming natural language data into actionable insights, they empower businesses to make informed decisions and drive innovation. RCA, in this context, presents distinct challenges:

9. Reliability and Consistency:

  • Root Cause: Ensuring reliability and consistency involves addressing challenges such as biases, inaccuracies, out-of-distribution inputs, fine-tuning problems, and user expectations.
  • Analysis: The root cause is related to the inherent complexities of working with language models, which can generate biased or inconsistent information.
  • Mitigation: Strategies include using diverse, high-quality training data, applying bias mitigation techniques, incorporating human oversight, creating feedback loops for users, and continuously monitoring and improving system performance.

10. Workflow Management:

  • Root Cause: Managing complex workflows can be challenging, particularly when multiple data sources and processing steps are involved.
  • Analysis: The root cause is the intricate nature of workflows, which can lead to code complexity and maintenance challenges.
  • Mitigation: Implementing abstraction layers and workflow management frameworks can simplify complex processes, making them more manageable.

“A problem well stated is a problem half-solved.”

– Charles Kettering

Case Studies

Despite these challenges, LLMs possess the potential to transform a multitude of industries, including industrial management and mechanical engineering. By addressing these challenges and embracing the lessons learned, the safe and effective integration of LLMs can be assured within different industrial sectors. Here are specific instances illustrating how LLMs are currently being applied in industrial management and mechanical engineering:

  • In the domain of industrial management, LLMs contribute to the creation of tools for optimizing production scheduling, inventory management, and risk mitigation. For instance, a company employs an LLM to develop an automated production scheduling tool that adapts to demand fluctuations, inventory levels, and machine availability. This innovation has led to cost reductions and increased operational efficiency.
  • Within mechanical engineering, LLMs may have a significant role in crafting tools for product design, simulating manufacturing processes, and predicting potential failures. As an illustration, a company harnesses an LLM to automate the product design process, taking into account customer requirements and engineering constraints. This tool has significantly reduced design time and elevated product quality.

Currently, LLMs have emerged as valuable tools in the development of advanced financial models designed to empower investors to make more informed decisions. These LLMs use vast datasets and complex algorithms to provide insights and predictions about market behavior, risk assessment, and investment opportunities. The significant obstacle is the inherent lack of transparency of LLMs. This can prevent the identification of error origins and complicate the process to improve the model accuracy. Also, the sensitivity of LLMs to market dynamics is another issue to contend with. Financial markets are inherently volatile, subject to rapid shifts in sentiment, and influenced by numerous variables. LLMs, while powerful, may struggle to adapt quickly enough to these fluctuations, leading to predictions that may become outdated or inaccurate. Significant efforts should be made to address the challenges and fully utilize the potential of LLM-based financial models. This includes improving model interpretability and refining algorithms to improve their resilience in dynamic market conditions. Ultimately, LLMs hold promise in revolutionizing the financial industry, but a sophisticated method to understand their limitations is crucial to use them effectively.

LLMs bring significant improvements to industrial processes like production scheduling and product design, reducing costs and improving efficiency. However, challenges in RCA come from the complex LLM predictions to ensure accurate and reliable industrial tools. As LLM technology continues to evolve, it is expected that these applications will expand, further improving the efficiency and safety of these industries.


LLM applications hold significant potential across various domains but are accompanied by complex and multifaceted obstacles that necessitate careful consideration. The inherent complexity, combined with their non-linear behavior and data-intensive nature, requires a sophisticated approach to RCA. Moreover, the critical issue of interpretability and explainability requires innovative techniques and strategies to shed light on the inner workings of black-box models. Data quality and preprocessing issues, including bias mitigation, cannot be underestimated, as they directly influence the reliability of analysis outcomes.

Furthermore, the dynamic nature of these applications necessitates continuous monitoring and adaptability to address concept drift and evolving data patterns. Scalability and performance challenges underscore the need for efficient resource management and cloud-based solutions. Real-world case studies and lessons learned to emphasize the significance of these challenges in various fields. The strategies outlined, such as explainable AI techniques, data quality improvement, and advanced monitoring, provide a roadmap for addressing the above-mentioned challenges effectively. Advancements in LLM explainability and ethical consideration will contribute to a more robust and reliable RCA.

In closing, the integration of these applications into industries and decision-making processes holds the potential for transformative impact. Addressing the key challenges in RCA is not only imperative but also paves the way for harnessing the full potential of LLMs in driving innovation and insight across diverse domains.


Key Challenges for Root

  • Reduce Risk
  • Simplify Compliance
  • Gain Visibility
  • Version Comparison